- Details
- Written by: Rod Boyle
- Category: Books
- Hits: 320
Bloody hell this took forever.
Anyways, overall, an interesting idea that spurred a lot of thought, but the source material, well - OK. Nonetheless I'll outline it again and then make my notes.
First and again, the author is arguing that Man is in the process of evolving from a period of "Self Consciousness" to a higher plain of Universal or "Cosmic Consciousness" in which he will be able to experience the divine as part of his day-to-day experience. As substantiation for his arguments he provides a long list of people he believe's have (at certain times, and for certain periods) experienced it, with quotes from both them and those people who knew them.
Beginning with Buddha, Jesus, Mohammed, etc. and ending with a more contemporary list of people; some of whom are listed by their initials only, others of whom are named, all of whom really loved Walt Whitman's "Leaves of Grass". I may have to give it a read.
A partial list follows, linked to their respective Wikipedia Pages, some of which make for more interesting reads than others.
And too many more to list. Now the author, as a Psychiatrist had a privileged insight into a lot of patients/inmates personality’s and experiences, unusual states of mind, and doubtless some of the acquaintances he made in his career influenced his observations. But - while not entirely doubting him, it doesn't hurt to be a little bit skeptical. The whole "I've achieved enlightenment and this is how it feels and perhaps you should/would benefit from it as well..." highlights the perils of self reporting, for what man doesn’t report himself better than his peers? And the belief that this is somehow an Aryan thing, or beyond the ken of more "primitive" tribes and civilizations does them a disservice, for only after we had destroyed their cultures and displaced them from their homes did we take a look at their spiritual practices. Language, culture, and the timed distance we put between them and our own understandings make it unlikely we'll ever know, but - from the books I've read, first hand and pertaining to North American and Australian Indigenous peoples they were far more in that zone than we are, and so (since we report on the extraordinary and rarely the ordinary) they have as much claim to this evolution as anyone.
As well the author overlooks that the mind can be trained to experience these things, as in Buddhist or Hindu traditions, and that indirectly the Christian tradition prepares one for the same epiphanies.
But, ignoring these criticisms, it's of it's age. Instead take the idea that you can somehow reframe and rewire and experience a world you had only hitherto suspected. Discarding the drugs (MDMA, ACID, MUSHROOMS, KETAMINE, Too many others to list) there are abundant instances in our current age where you can be "transformed" with an attenuation of sense you had never suspected.
Try for example Color Blind Glasses (Link provided to people getting colour blind glasses...). Clearly the experience is one that is both transformational - an invisible world becomes apparent. Or babies getting glasses or babies getting hearing aids.
Or lying between 2 giant trumpets in the forest to have all those quiet noises that lie beneath your perception made audible.
But these are technological remedies to sensory deficits. Consider that human beings have had colour cones since we were apes (they share a similar eye biology), yet only relatively recently did these distinctions make it into language.
Gladstone's colour theory postulates that Man/Humankind did not evolve a colour sense until relatively recently is undermined by the fact that the Ancient Egyptians were using Blue as a pigment as early as 2500 BCE. It's late entry into language, though, is suspicious, or curious - and the abundant studies of certain tribes and cultures that could not differentiate shades of blue/green until they were taught. But - their hardware (cones, rods) is the same, it is only that they have been bounded or restrained by language. So - while our hardware (bodies) are relatively the same; our software (thinking and language) are different.
When language expands, so do concepts and our ability to think. Which suggests that just as we hope to upgrade our software (language) we can hope to expand our experience(s) of the world.
Consider then Tetrachromats, with 4 types of cones in their eyes and a much vaster spectrum of colour than language will provide. Factually a different hardware, running on legacy code. Or synesthetes, who's experience of vision or sound is tied to another sensory input, "seeing" red as a colour and experiencing it as noise or a taste or touch sensation of some sort. Old hardware, new code. Imagining that you are the first to achieve this hyper-attenuation, a new cell in your eye that expands your spectrum, sharpen your vision to that of a Mantis Shrimp, with it's ability to see in ultraviolet and polarized rays, or a Hawk or Eagle, evolve the olfactory sensibility of a dog, the hearing of a whale, every enhancement of sense demanding a correlating enhancement in the brain to process and - in time, language to express and share it.
Or Supertasters, of which I'm sure my neighbour is one, you have only to watch her face as she bites into a dessert to know that her experience of it is so far beyond my own, but then words fail her in describing...
And consider the vocabularies of taste and smell - 5 basic tastes, Umami, Salty, Sweet, Sour and Bitter, after which everything is described in terms that can only make sense if you have prior experience of the taste or food it's referencing. And the same with scent - one theory lists the seven primary scents as "camphoraceous, musky, floral, pungent, ethereal, minty and putrid", almost all of which require some experience of items similarly described.
Contrast this with numbers - I have the theory of numbers, the experience of small numbers, and I can generalize from this up to larger numbers. I don't need the entire infinitude of integers or fractions to make sense of the world. But - the vocabulary of scent, taste, is meaningless without experience of these things.
...which is making me think of language as a virus, something that exists beyond us, a parasite that needs 2 hosts in order to evolve itself, grow, a parasite with a will and direction of it's own.
Consider LLM's, with their evolving "intelligence", AI is a little hyped and overused but their building upon the language of code and numbers and grow their "software" based on their interactions with others.
IN time, presumably, they will have to update their "hardware" to process these new ideas that they're creating...
Which makes curious, the stages of a babies psychological development, the child then of a magician who never learns object permanence, how then is their experience of the world? What narrative of their existence? Or a cat, just discovering (gingerly, slow pats of the salt shaker while sat upon the cupboard) discovering gravity? And wonder at the worlds of angels, fairies, elves and demons beyond our ken, coloured in shades beyond our perception...
- Details
- Written by: Rod Boyle
- Category: Books
- Hits: 320
A curious book, found at a thrift shop and purchased despite the title and cover.
First published in 1901, the author argues that man is in his "Self Conscious" stage of existence, in which he is aware of himself (differentiated from the animals, that have an awareness of others but presumably not themselves. We now know that for certain species this is untrue). But - from time to time, certain men have achieved a sort of illumination, or enlightenment, and he argues that this is a trend forward for humanity in consciousness - that eventually we'll all transcend our self-conscious selves and become at one with the universe as we can perceive it (or, as we don't).
Of Canadian descent (reassuring in that most saviours seem to come from Galilee or Tibet) he describes his childhood in backwoods Canada, his growing up, travels, love of Walt Whitman (who, coincidentally is definitely one of the enlightened ones) before proceeding towards his theories of consciousness. Himself a psychiatrist the author proves very well informed on any number of issues and rather out of date on others (as is to be expected.)
It reminds me vaguely of Hegel's "The Philosophy of History" in that the author argues conscious awakening is, in a way, an inevitable part of being human. A little ray of sunshine to distract one from the news cycle...
But his Thesis is not the point, it's the questions he raises (in my mind, at least - along the way).
First of all, his views on Women and enlightenment and Savage/"Lower Races" on enlightenment - well, .... that isn't cutting it today. Even if he were right, which I strongly suspect he isn't. Culture is far more definitive than race. But he's not working from a place of ignorance or hate, merely a lack of information and through the lens of his time.
Some of his (so far) enlightened persons include Mohammed, Jesus, Buddha, Shakespeare (Francis Bacon), Dante, and so on and so forth. He finds no shortage of exemplary lives and attributed quotes to support his arguments. Of interest were his references to Colour Theory - that man has only recently developed a nuanced colour sense (and there is abundant evidence and other theories to support this, which I have referenced before), and extends this same theory to fragrance and taste (again, these things lacked a vocabulary until relatively modern times), he argues that colour blindness is simply atavism, that insanity is caused by the hyper-attenuation of modern senses, that as we "evolve" those higher up are more prone to mental illness, the foundation not yet secured, and so forth and so on.
Not everything is to be agreed upon, but he does force you to consider things from a different perspective.
Points of disagreement: that self awareness is not present in dreams (it can be, as in lucid dreams), that a effect can never be greater than it's cause (clearly and almost always untrue), that the Aryan Race is the most highly developed/evolved, that women have disproportionally fewer representatives of Cosmic Consciousness (possible - if you consider that women conform more to the mean than men do, and so men are overrepresented in things like mental health struggles - and, by extension, "Peak Experiences" that tear off the veil...)
anyways, a curious read but non-essential. Now probably I should attempt to elevate myself through some meditation, but I think instead it's time for lunch...
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Maurice_Bucke
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_Consciousness
Link: https://archive.org/details/cosmicconsciousn01buck/page/n7/mode/2up
- Details
- Written by: Rod Boyle
- Category: Books
- Hits: 300
It seems redundant to write "Autobiography of..." and then the name of the Author, but - really, upon reading this I had the distinct feeling that I was cheated of a few hundred pages. In any even, this was written some 20+ years before his death, and before his reason became suspiciously abstracted.
Noting his childhood peculiarities, certain synesthete properties, his OCD, his sense of Childhood Invention and Inquiry frequently discouraged by parents and teachers, his experience of Crows after his repeated murdering of them, his realization that instinct transcends knowledge (but only when a certain remedial level of knowledge is reached, otherwise we arrive a peak Dunning-Kruger), the hyper-acuity of his senses, sight, hearing, body, and other more extra-sensory phenomena.
A curious childhood, but if we all could recall as accurately as he and were as encouraged (I know I previously said discouraged, but he was perhaps less discouraged than most of us) we might all lay claim to some such.
Then comes his genius, his subsequent exploitation by Edison - and, notice, he is careful in this not to slander he former employers or benefactors, upon reading his focus and obsession is always technology.
Noteworthy, he anticipates building a hydro-electric damn at Niagara Falls some 30 years before he was to do so, which recalls other such famous incidents: (the experience of Nusrat Fateh Ali Kahn anticipating his singing at the ... Mosque, Nelson from Nelson picturing his perfect house as a child, Henry Sugar, The Secret, An Experiment with Time, too many other's to list...).
His unconscious method of turning from insurmountable problems to allow them to solve themselves "on their own" while he worked on other things, (mine own, although it took me some 20 years to perfect and I'm not sure now that I'm just not avoiding getting anything done) and his remarkably (for the time) democratic views on Race.
And finally, his ability to foresee the future - the interconnectedness of technology, of text, voice, picture, he's was an optimist working for the benefit of mankind, and - I have to wonder, if he could step forward a hundred years, how impressed he'd be with the progress we'd made, and the ends we put it to?
- Details
- Written by: Rod Boyle
- Category: Books
- Hits: 193
A curious late Victorian read that for a long time was more popular than Dracula.
Abandoning the forward, which threatened to wring any joy I might get from the book itself with analysis of events I had yet to read. An afterword would be suitable, but these forwards that presume you read the book (!!) and seek to destroy it with their socio-political analysis, spoilers on plot points, etc, etc. Highly annoying.
Anyways, back to the book - a homeless man breaks into a house, and encounters a sinister and quite possibly supernatural force that has made it's way to London for unholy vengeance upon a certain esteemed politician.
A dark secret slowly unfolding, the mystery slowly is teased out through the 5 main narrators, melodramatic, themes of electricity and science driving out the Old Gods of Infinite Terror, of Xenophobia and the fear of the conquered other, of occult and ancient cults that kidnap English Christian Maidens, subject them to orgies of unimaginable cruelty before burning them alive as a sacrifice to ISIS, ...
Well, too much more and you won't want to read it. An interesting and curious read, which if you're at all inclined you can do so here:
LINK: The Beetle - Richard Marsh VIA PROJECT GUTENBERG
- Details
- Written by: Rod Boyle
- Category: Books
- Hits: 183
A collection of short stories by Anais Nin, some more intriguing than others.
I have some prejudices against her rather hedonistic lifestyle (as if I'm in a position to throw stones, but I do nonetheless...), but she can write and evoke some curious ideas. I might revisit her diaries some day, as I've now read enough Miller to know her better, and the internet might provide me some context as to their relationship. I recall watching "Henry and June" once upon a time, but was only then familiar with Henry Miller, and slightly.
Perhaps time for a little digging, adventure in the literary world, but not today.